The prologue to our fair tome breaks the literary fourth wall, addresses the reader, and acknowledges the rather boorish nature of the prose to come. As my fingers eagerly turned the pages of my hot pink volume, I was left to wonder about the purpose of this pseudo realistic prologue; the fictional acknowledgment that the lovely Chris, Cathy, Cory, and Carrie had actually been locked in an attic by their evil grandmother and left to sexually awaken in each other’s arms. Was the hope that a prologue claiming realism would elevate the status of the familial bodice ripper to the great literature of orphans, underdogs, and scoundrels? Was it meant to legitimize the enterprise of writing and reading about four children of incest, two of whom are drawn to one another by the alluring thrall of puberty mixed with claustrophobia?
Armed with these questions, and a slightly dirty feeling left over from the passa
I then clinked on the link to The Complete VC Andrews, which provided, among other things, a Frequently Asked Question section. I quote, “Is Flowers in the Attic based on a true story?” The author of the FAQ section answered the question in rather explicit detail, citing Ms. Andrew’s acknowledgment that elements of her stories (undisclosed) were based on life, as well as her own dreams and fantasies. Slightly harshly they remind the reader that while only Ms. Andrew’s could truly answer this question, she is quite dead and has been since 1986. (Despite the fact that her next book is due out in September.) Further, the author of the FAQ indicates that just because you read something doesn’t mean it’s true. I nodded my head in somber agreement, and then I began to read possible theories put forth to explain the root of the true story rumors. Snidely putting aside my own reading of the prologue which clearly stated that it was a true story, I quote again: “The story itself is so realistic, why couldn't it happen for real?” and “There was a similar news story around the same time that the book came out, and it was assumed that the two were related.” Word. The true story rumors got told. (Yes, I am in the process of searching for the allusive "similar news story.")
I am a diligent Googler though, and clicked on one more website, Snopes.com, which is devoted to getting to the bottom of rumors and urban legends. On January 28, 2004, CJ inquired as to the validity of the true story rumors. I tried reading through the three pages of answers, but the conversation pretty much devolved to a general discussion of the incestuous nature of the book and how odd it is that it’s mostly read by adolescent girls. As that is the intended topic of this blog, I didn’t want to feel redundant, so I pretended I hadn’t read it.
The fact that the discussion immediately went where it did was telling though. Sure, we can speculate about whether or not VC Andrews spent her youth boinking her blonde brother in an attic and that the biographical information regarding a crippling accident and commercial artistry is all a bunch of hooey. But, the fact of the matter is, the cultural significance of Flowers in the Attic has nothing to do with truth or fiction. Rather it has to do with the reality of the naughty feeling that so many of us had as we laid on our couch at eleven, eyeing our parents and siblings suspiciously, while thinking, “They did that? With their sibling? I didn’t even know you could do that,” and then took a cold, cold shower.
No comments:
Post a Comment